The LDS Church, the SEC Fine, and the Shell Companies: A Spiritual and Practical Analysis

by Jack Mormon | Jul 23, 2025 | Church Finances

Bottom Line

This isn’t about whether the Church can have wealth. It’s about whether it will honor God in how it stewards that wealth. Legal strategies matter—but moral accountability matters more. Members deserve not only reassurance, but real transparency. And the Lord, if He truly leads the Church, requires nothing less.

The LDS Church, the SEC Fine, and the Shell Companies: A Spiritual and Practical Analysis

📜 The Background

In February 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) fined Ensign Peak Advisors (EPA)—the investment arm of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints—$4 million, and the Church itself $1 million. The SEC found that from 1997 to 2019, Ensign Peak used 13 shell LLCs to file misleading investment disclosures, effectively concealing the true size and identity of the Church’s investment portfolio (then worth over $30 billion; now estimated near $100 billion). The Church settled without admitting wrongdoing.

The SEC’s report states the Church went to “great lengths” to avoid disclosure, a phrase many critics interpret as confirming systemic deception.

🧭 LDS Doctrine on Honesty and Obedience to Law

Latter-day Saints hold honesty as a sacred covenantal principle, not just an ethical guideline. It’s embedded in:

• Temple recommend interviews: “Are you honest in your dealings with your fellow men?”
• Articles of Faith #12 & #13: “We believe in being honest, true, chaste…”
• Scripture:
  • D&C 134:6 – “We believe that all men are bound to sustain and uphold the respective governments in which they reside.”
  • Alma 27:27 – “They were distinguished for their zeal… and their honesty.”

Thus, when an institution that proclaims divine guidance is caught violating federal disclosure laws—even civilly—it invites spiritual scrutiny as well as public criticism.

🧠 Why the Church Did It: The Institutional Logic

The Church has stated that it sought to:

1. Preserve the sanctity of sacred funds by avoiding public scrutiny and speculation.
2. Protect donor privacy to discourage targeting or harassment.
3. Prevent manipulation or market distortion caused by public knowledge of its financial footprint.

In effect, the Church was using perfectly legal strategies—until the SEC ruled that the intent behind those strategies constituted misleading conduct under securities law.

🛡️ The Legal Line Crossed

• Using LLCs to manage investments is not inherently illegal.
• But intentionally masking control and beneficial ownership over $100 billion in assets year after year violated SEC transparency rules.
• Once exposed, Ensign Peak began filing properly in 2020 and settled the case civilly.

🙏 Spiritual Analysis: Where the Church Fell Short

Despite legal motivations, the spiritual concern is this:

⚖️ Intent matters. So does perception.

Even if Church lawyers believed they were acting within the law, the intent to obscure violates the higher law of moral honesty—especially for a Church that requires moral rectitude from its members.

Scriptures reinforcing this principle:

• Mosiah 2:22 – “He doth require that ye should do as he hath commanded you… and be honest.”
• 2 Corinthians 8:21 – “Providing for honest things, not only in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men.”

🧎‍♂️ Shouldn’t the Lord’s Church Lead by Example?

Members pay tithing in faith, often at personal sacrifice. Discovering that their sacred funds were protected by a shell game—even if well-intentioned—has rightly provoked disappointment, anger, and demands for accountability.

💡 Why Did the SEC Fine Matter So Much?

1. It confirmed long-standing suspicions about financial secrecy.
2. It contrasted with the Church’s teachings about integrity.
3. It revealed dissonance between global financial reality and local member experience.

🧭 The Best Defense: Context, Not Excuses

A fair rebuttal acknowledges the Church’s missteps but also frames the institutional context:

• The Church did not engage in fraud, embezzlement, or insider trading.
• It has since changed its practices and now complies with disclosure laws.
• No funds were lost or stolen.
• Intent was institutional privacy, not personal gain.
• All major religions use tax-exempt strategies to some extent.

But again—“To whom much is given, much is required.”

💬 Balanced Bottom Line

The LDS Church made a serious error in prioritizing financial opacity over transparency. Though not criminal, its legal workaround violated the spirit of its own doctrine on honesty. It must now earn back the trust of its members through transparency, humility, and clear accountability.

📖 Recommended Actions for the Church (Spiritually and Practically)

1. Public repentance and acknowledgment, not just legal compliance.
2. Detailed annual financial disclosures to members.
3. Increase humanitarian aid and ward budgets.
4. Model institutional integrity alongside personal virtue.
5. Demonstrate that sacred funds serve sacred ends.

“The Church tells the poor to pay tithing instead of eating” Really? Alyssa Grendel

by Jack Mormon | Jul 22, 2025 | Church Finances

Bottom Line

Quoting a devotional metaphor without its full spiritual context misrepresents both the doctrine and the practice. The Church teaches sacrifice — not starvation. And compassion is the rule, not cruelty.

🔍 Core Finding

The quote is real, but it’s not policy. Elder Lynn G. Robbins used it in a sermon to teach faith during hardship, not to promote starvation. The Church’s actual welfare system is built on feeding the hungry — not testing them.

📖 What Elder Robbins Actually Said

“If a destitute family is faced with the decision of paying their tithing or eating, they should pay their tithing.” “But they should also go to their bishop for help.”
— GC, Apr. 2005

🧾 Church Policy vs. Sermon Metaphor

• Bishops are instructed to help the poor regardless of tithing status.
• Tithing is voluntary and not enforced by penalty.
• Fast offerings and humanitarian funds exist to meet basic needs.

📚 Sources

• Elder Lynn G. Robbins, GC Apr. 2005
• Church Handbook: Welfare Principles
• Doctrine & Covenants 42:30–31; Malachi 3:10
• Mormoner.org – Tithing & Worthiness

The Church Purposely Concealed Funds – Partial Truth Again from Alyssa Grenfell

by Jack Mormon | Jul 21, 2025 | Church Finances

Bottom Line

The SEC fine was real but not for fraud, theft or criminal deception. The violation was technical. The money was never hidden from Church leaders or misused. There was no fraud charge, no missing funds, and no accusation of wrongdoing toward Church members. This claim is a textbook case of exaggerating a filing error into a scandal.

🔍 Core Finding

Yes, the Church and Ensign Peak Advisors were fined $5 million by the SEC in 2023 — but not for concealing the amount of wealth they held. The fine was related to how they reported their holdings through shell LLCs, not for hiding money from members or regulators.

📊 What the SEC Actually Said

“The Church and Ensign Peak caused the Church’s investment portfolio to be misstated in 13F filings… The SEC’s order finds that the Church was aware of the use of shell companies and approved the structure.”
— SEC Press Release, Feb. 2023

The fine was for technical disclosure violations — not fraud, not misuse of tithing, and not for lying to members.

🧠 What the Narrator Gets Wrong

Saying the Church was fined for “purposefully concealing how much money they had” is a dramatic oversimplification. The SEC did not allege the Church was hiding total assets. It cited irregularities in how stock holdings were filed — using third-party LLCs to mask identity, not the amount.

📖 Church Response

“Ensign Peak and the Church have cooperated with the government… We affirm our commitment to comply with the law, regret mistakes made, and now consider this matter closed.”
— Church Statement, Feb. 2023

📚 Sources

• SEC Press Release: Feb. 2023
• Church Statement on Ensign Peak
• Terryl Givens, The Crucible of Doubt, Ch. 8
• Mormoner.org – Church Wealth & Ensign Peak